top of page

NEWS & UPDATES

  • Russell Granat Simultaneous Chess Match

Monday 7th April - 7:35pm

Come One, Come All!

Russell will be hosting a Simultaneous Chess Match on Monday 7th April with a prompt start at 7:35.

All the rules will be explained beforehand; This is a bit of fun for everyone we play every season.
 

  • Chessboard Geometry

The appearance of Chessboards and the powers of Chess pieces were originally different from those we are familiar with today, having gradually evolved over the years. 
At first, Boards were of uniform colour, and the movement of several of the pieces was very limited. For example, the Queen could move only one square diagonally and the Bishop was limited to diagonal moves two Squares at a time but could jump over intervening pieces. 
Chequered Boards, at first mostly red and white rather than black and white, and now with a range of colours, were being used in at least the 11th century and became more common as time went on. 
Later, when the powers of the pieces were extended, particularly those of the Queen and Bishop, the game benefited from having a chequered board as it facilitated the accurate movement of those pieces along Diagonals.

Nowadays, when we start learning to play Chess, we gradually become familiar with the Algebraic Notation System - a great improvement on the earlier Descriptive Notation - and we come to associate typical piece movements with particular Squares. 
For example, we discover that the f1-Knight is sometimes developed to e2 but usually goes to f3, from where it may later move to d4, e5, g5 or even (as in the King's Indian Defence) to e1 or d2; while the f1-Bishop is commonly developed to e2, d3, c4, b5 or in Fianchetto formation at g2.

With knowledge of that nature we are gradually building a mental picture of the Chessboard in a way somewhat similar to how we gradually form mental maps of buildings we visit and towns in which we live; and we become able to mentally visualise movements on the Board. 
In that task, it is of considerable help if we are fully familiar with the colours of the Squares as this helps in the visualisation, particularly with diagonal moves. 
It is not necessary, or desirable, to try to form a photographic image of the board or pieces, as that takes too much processing power. 
The information can be held mostly in an abstract way. 
For example, with my Bishop at c4, it is sufficient for me to know that from that Square, one of my pieces is firing along the a2-g8 Diagonal and the f1-a6 Diagonal. 
That, in essence, is how Blindfold Chess is played, and how we are able to think about and discuss chess moves away from the Board. 
The more familiar we are with the Board in association with the pieces, the easier it becomes for us to analyse positions and plan manoeuvres.

The following diagram is from a Worthing Club game of more than 50 years ago, when the Club met in a room at the Dome Cinema. 
The game started in the Tarrasch Variation of the French Defence. 
It shows the position at Move 40 with Black to move, where White has a Knight and pawn for Black's Bishop. 
Black has built up strong pressure against White's g2-pawn, and now adds his Bishops to the attack.

40. ...             Be4
41. Ng5            ...
Attacking both Rook and Bishop, and cutting Black's line of communication.
The best response would have been 41....Rxg2+, leading to 42.Rxg2 Bxg2, 43.Qxg2 Qc7, 44.Qg3 fxg5, 45.fxg5 Qxg3+, 46.Kxg3 Rxg5 with a level position.
However, Black gave up the exchange.

41.  ...              Rxg5
42. fxg5          Qxg5
43. Re1            f5
44. Re3           Qh6
45. Rg3           Rd8
46. d5!             ...
The pawn is now attacked three times but Black cannot afford to take it as the move has opened the long diagonal leading to Black's King, creating the threat of Qd4+ with mate to follow.
Black promptly closes the diagonal.

46.  ...              e5
White continues to advance his pawn, luring Black's Rook away from the Back Rank.

47. d6              Rxd6
48. Qb6!           ...

Position after 48. Qb6

48. ...              Qxd2
Capturing the Rook and preparing to block a Back Rank Check by using his Queen and Rook Battery.
Has White blundered?

49. Qb8+        Rd8
Black has secured the 8th rank, but ....

50. Qxe5#
The Queen unexpectedly changes course to a different square on the vulnerable long diagonal.

Final position after Qxe5#

In manoeuvres such as occurred towards the end of the game, players are helped by having a Board with chequered Squares, which assist the visualisation of potential moves, particularly with pieces that move along diagonals.

JK / 03.03.25

  • Dithering Bishops

In the Teams section of this website you will find a report on our first team's tough match against Brighton & Hove 1, which took place on 24th February. Here is an analysis of Russell's game, which secured our only win.

White: Russell Granat (2223)
Black: Mikolaj Rogacewicz (2174)
Event: Worthing 1 v Brighton & Hove 1, 24th February 2025
Opening: C16: French Defence, Winawer, Advance Variation



1.e4           e6
2.d4          d5
3.Nc3        Bb4       
4.e5           ...   
So far, surprisingly orthodox play from Russell, but after the next pair of moves the game goes off the beaten track, where he prefers to be. 

4. ...           b6
This has a much lower following than the more usual 4....c5 or 4....Ne7. Black is aiming to exchange the light-squared Bishops, because with the central pawn structure his bishop is normally blocked in, whereas White's is normally very active. But the manoeuvre takes four moves compared with one for White, and is therefore not often played: b7-b6, Bc8-a6, Nxa6 (capturing White's Bishop), and Na6-b8.

5. Bd2         ...
To avoid disruption of the Queenside pawns. If occurring a move earlier this would have recreated Alekhine's unintentional gambit played against Flohr at the Nottingham Tournament, 1936.  
 

Position after 5.Bd2

5. ...           Qd7
If, instead, the immediate 5....Ba6, 6.Bxa6 Nxa6, then after 7.Qg4 Black does not have the option of defending the g7-pawn by playing f6 - a typical way of attacking White's pawn centre in the French Defence.

6. a3           Bf8
Preferable was capturing the Knight, even though it would not disrupt White's pawns.
The outcome of the Bishop's excursion is that White has gained two useful moves.
​
7. Nge2         ...
With the idea of an early f2-f4. But the drawback of developing the Knight to e2, rather than to f3 (where it also defends the e5-pawn), is that Black could now reply with ...Ba6, making it awkward for White to complete development and preserve the right to castle, unless he were to fianchetto the Bishop, where it would be rather passive. Occasionally White's light-squared Bishop can be deployed to h3 in conjunction with pawns at f4 and g4, a Knight at g3 and a Rook at f1, when the advance f4-f5 would have massive support - provided Black does nothing to disrupt such a plan. Meanwhile, Black would have his own plans, including applying pressure against d4 and e5. Something similar to that idea for White occurs later in the game.
​
7. ...             c5
This is logical, but ....Ba6 first would have been better.
​
8. b4!?         ...
Played by Russell instinctively, entailing a pawn sacrifice to achieve a freer game. 
A main alternative was 8.Ng1 (aiming for f3) when ....cxd4?! (better would be ....Ba6) is well met by 9.Bb5 Nc6, 10.Nce2 Nge7, 11.Nf3 a6, 12.Bxc6 Nxc6, 13.Nexd4 Nxd4, 14.Nxd4 Bc5, 15.c3, with the idea of Bd2-f4 and 0-0, giving White a comfortable position with a strong central Knight to balance Black's Bishop pair.

8. ...             cxb4?!
Black opts for material gain, leaving White's pawn centre intact. It does not turn out well for Black. A main alternative was 8....Nc6.
​
9. axb4        Bxb4
10. Nf4!         ...
Now White is back on top.

10. ...            Nc6

11. Nb5          ...

Position after 11.  Nb5

11. ...           Bf8?
The Bishop appears to be attached to a piece of elastic. Equally bad was 11.... Bxd2+, 12.Qxd2 Kf8, 13.Nd6 Nf6, 14.Bb5 Ne4, 15.Nxe4 dxe4, 16.c4 Qc7, 17.Bxc6 Qxc6, 18.0-0 when the greedy ....Qxc4 would have led to disaster after 19.Rfc1 b5, 20.d5!.
Black's best response would have been 11....Be7.

12. Be2         ...
More energetic would have been 12.c4!, striking in the centre while Black's King is stranded there; e.g. 12....dxc4, 13.Bxc4 Nxd4, 14.Qa4! with a large advantage. After the text move White remains slightly better.
​
12. ...             Bb7
13. c3             a6
14. Na3          Nge7
15. Nh5!         ...
Tying down Black's f- and g-pawns because of the potential fork at f6.

15. ...              b5
16. Nc2          Nc8
 

Position after 16.  ... Nc8

Black is cramped, with too many pieces in too little room, because of his earlier indecision with both Bishops. His Knight is heading for the protected outpost c4.

17. O-O         Nb6
18. f4             O-O-O
Understandably, Black does not like the look of the advancing f-pawn. Instead of the text move, 18...Ne7 is adequately met by Be2-d3.

19. f5              Rg8
Presumably anticipating pawn captures at e6 followed by ...Be7, allowing Black to advance his g-pawn.  Relatively better would have been continuing with the planned ...Nc4.

20. Bg4          ...
Also good was 20.fxe6 fxe6, 21.Be1!, a multi-purpose move, anticipating a Black Knight appearing at c4, freeing the Queen, defending the c3-pawn, and creating the option of development at h4. 21.... Nc4, 22.Qd3! with the dual points of threatening the h7-pawn and also preparing the manoeuvres Qd3-h3 together with Be2-g4 (a theme actually played) and, if necessary, Nh5-f4, applying more pressure to the e6-pawn.
Meanwhile, Black will have difficulty dealing with the attack on his h7-pawn without weakening his position.​

20. ...             Kb8
Getting out of the line of fire and making room for the b7-Bishop, to help defend the e6-pawn.

21. Qf3           Re8
22. Qh3         Nc4
23. Bc1           Bc8

Position after 23....Bc8

24. fxe6         ...
A good alternative was 24.Ne3 when relatively best for Black seems to be ...N4xe5, giving up a piece for the e- and d-pawns and at last giving his pieces some air.
Instead, if (in reply to Ne3) Black tries 24. ...Nxe3 then White, after 25.Bxe3, will win the race to control the dark squares on the queenside, e.g. 25....Be7, 26.Bc1 Bd8, 27.Ba3 Na5, 28.Bd6+ Ka7, 29.fxe6 fxe6, 30.Nf4 Nc4, 31.Bc5+ Bb6, 32.Nd3 with an overwhelming position.
​
24. ...             fxe6
25. Nf4          g6
26. Nd3         h5

Position after 26....h5

At last Black is fighting back.

27. Bf3          ...
More advantageous would have been a retreat to e2, as at f3 the Bishop is blocking the action of the rook on the f-file and that of the queen on the third rank; and it also provides Black with a target for his g-pawn. 
Additionally, from e2 (to where it later moves) the Bishop could in the future be called on to capture the Black Knight at c4, or, if that has meanwhile moved, to put pressure on the pawns at b5 and a6.​

27. ...             Qd8
White now has only a small edge.

28. g4?!          ...
A typical unexpected move by Russell, who had in mind that it gave his Queen a flight square at g2 and prevented the unrestricted advance of Black's g-pawn. 
Instead, moving the Bishop to e2 would still have been a good idea, for the same reasons as before.
The text move weakens White's King position directly opposite Black's heavy artillery.

28. ...             Be7!
Black, who has retained his extra pawn and is becoming more active, now has the advantage.

29. Qg2          ...
Switching targets to the d5-pawn and getting off the line of the c8-Bishop, which could become a factor if, after further preparation, the d5-pawn is captured.

29. ...             Ref8
30. Ne3         Nxe3
31.  Bxe3       Na5

Position after 31....Na5

The reserve cavalry hurries to resume guard on the c4-square.
From this point of the game Black was very low on time and was relying on move increments.

32. Bh6         Rf7
33. Be2         Rxf1+

Black understandably, both because of time shortage, and also because he has been cramped for so long, now seeks further simplification.
A better course, however, was to move the challenged rook to the h-file with gain of time from the attack on White's Bishop, then capture the g4-pawn (to prevent White blocking the file by advancing it) whereupon he has the potential to double Rooks on the h-file and cause some mischief.

34. Bxf1          ...
Capturing this way seems to allow the Queen to transfer rapidly to the Queenside, but Black could have discouraged that by next capturing the g4-pawn.

34. ...             Nc4
35. Bc1          ...

Position after 35. ​Bc1

35. ...             Bg5?
Again, a typical reaction by a player in time trouble.
But White correctly avoids capturing the Bishop and concentrates on probing Black's King position.
Black had several moves that maintained his theoretical advantage (ignoring the state of his clock), including 35...hxg4, 35.Qxg4 g5.

36. Nb4!          ...
With the dual threats at c6 and a6. Black is easily able to parry these, but White gains the necessary tempo to disrupt the a6-c4-e6 barrier around Black's King.

36. ...             Bb7

Position after 36. ​Bb7

37. Bxc4          ...
The main alternative, 37.Nxa6+ could plausibly lead to mutual threats of perpetual check, e.g. 37....Bxa6, 38.Rxa6 Bxc1, 39.Bxc4 Qh4, 40.Bf1 Rf8, 41.Qe2 Kc7, 42.Ra7+ Kb6, 43.Rb7+ Kxb7, 44.Qxb5+ Kc8, 45.Qc6+ Kb8, 46.Qd6+ Kb7, 47.Qxf8 Qxg4+, 48.Bg2 Be3+, 49.Kh1 Bf4, 50.Qb4+ and so on.

37. ...             dxc4
Gaining an attack on White's Queen and apparently establishing control of the long diagonal. But it is an illusion. Black's only path to survival was a very narrow one: 37....Bxc1!, 38.Nxa6+ Bxa6, 39.Rxa6 Qh4! (but not ....bxc4, 40.Qa2 when mate will follow in a few moves), 40.Bxb5 Rf8 when, e.g., 41.Rb6+ Kc7, 42.Rc6+ Kb7, 43.Qg3 Qg5, 44.Rxe6 h4, 45.Qg2 Qe3+, 46.Kh1 Qe1+, 47.Qg1 Qe4+, 48.Qg2 Qe1+ with a draw by repetition, as White cannot afford to interpose his Bishop. (And not the hasty 48....Rf1+, because the White Bishop controls its home square.)

38. Nc6+       Bxc6
39. Qxc6       Bxc1
40. Rxc1          ...
Instead, the tempting 40.Rxa6 fails to ....Be3+, 41.Kg2 Qd5+, 42.Qxd5 exd5, 43.Rb6+ Kc7, 44.Rxb5 Rd8, when Black's extra piece will be decisive.

40. ...             Rg7

Position after 40. ​Rg7

41. Rf1           1 - 0
At this point, from the pressure on the Board and on the clock, Black lost on time.
However, White's last move, apparently both active and restraining, would, in the absence of the time forfeit, have allowed Black to continue with 41.Rb7! when some sample lines are:

​

(A) 42.Rf6 Qb6, 43.Qxb6 Rxb6, 44.d5 Kc7, 45.d6+ Kd7, 46.Rxg6 b4, 47.cxb4,

   when (i)  47. ....Rxc6, 48.Rg7+ Kd8, 49.Rg8+ Kd7, 50.Rg7+ Kc8, 51.Rg8+ Kd7 with a draw.

   or (ii) 47. ....hxg4, 48.Rg7+ Ke8, 49.Rg8+ Kd7, 50.Rxg4 Rxb4, 51.h4 Rb5, 52.Rg7+ drawn.

​

(B) 42.Qxa6 b4, 43.Qxe6 bxc3, 44.Qxc4 c2, 45.Qxc2 Qxd4+, 46.Kh1 Qd5+, 47.Qg2 Qxg2+, 48.Kxg2 with a theoretical draw.

​

(C) 42.Qxe6 b4, 43.Qxc4 b3, 44.Qxc4 b3, 45.Rb1 Qg5, 46.Qd6+ Kc8, 47.Qc6+ Kb8, 48.Qf3 Qc1+, 49.Qf1 Qe3+, 50.f2 Qe4, 51.Qf8+ Kc7, 52.Qf7+ etc, with a draw.

​

After Black's 40th move the most promising continuation would seem to be 41.Qxa6 when Black needs to defend his b-pawn with ...Rb7 (but not by ...Qd5 which allows 42.Rf1 which is now a killing blow), whereupon after 42.Qxe6 one feasible continuation among others would be ...b4, 43.Qf6 Qxf6, 44.exf6 Rf7, 45.g5 b3, 46.Kf2 Kc7, 47.Ke3 Kd6, 48.h4 Rf8, 49.Ra1, when White maintains an edge, although there is still plenty of play. 

​

One often hears players - but of course, not members of our Club, and certainly not Russell's opponent - explaining away a loss as being due to shortage of time.

​

In that situation it is as well to bear in mind Alekhine's comment:
"The fact that a player is very short of time is, to my mind, as little to be considered as an excuse as, for instance, the statement of the law-breaker that he was drunk at the moment he committed the crime."  [Chess Life, Vol. 16-18, 1961. p. 113 ]

​

JK / 28.02.25

​

Fantastic to see so many members playing this week now that 2025 is in full swing, just like how things were before lockdown struck.

Keep up the great effort guys! More players means more opportunities for games, events and learning to achieve higher quality Chess.

  • Worthing Handicap Rapid Tournament Report

by Chris Jones

2025 started with a handicap rapid, with 15 minutes for each round. Twenty-one members turned out to play and the evening was a great success. 

The handicap was based on time, with Russell and Chris having two minutes against thirteen in most rounds. The pressure eventually told, with Russell and Chris falling to an early loss and the clear front runners were Peter and Sidhanth. 

Peter was on fire and achieved the perfect score of six, Beating both Russell and Chris in the process. Sidhanth came second with Russell and Chris back on four points. 

  • ECF Sussex League - Knockout Cup : Match Report Crowborough 2 vs. Worthing

by Peter Larwood

Date: Friday 25 October 2024
Event: Crowborough 2 vs. Worthing ;  ECF LMS - Sussex League Knockout Cup Match
Result: 3.5 - 1

Worthing were drawn away to Crowborough 2 - their second cup team. 

The event is grading handicapped and we found ourselves needing to win with 2.5 or more to go through to the next round.

Ben Glyn-Jones on Board 4 started badly. He had a junior opponent who played well above his grade and who played a complicated position very well.

Graham Davie on Board 3 came to a late Middlegame with a pawn down which led to a second junior win.

Keith Guiness on Board 2 was outgraded and outplayed.

I was on Top Board and outgraded my opponent.  He played the Opening better than me giving me no counterplay. Fortunately however, he drifted allowing an exchange of my Rook for a Bishop and a Knight soon followed by me picking up another pawn. I made heavy work but eventually I won.

So we lost 3.5 - 1 including a 0.5 point handicap adjustment.

So just like last year, there's always next year.

Official ECF Result Summary can be found HERE. 

  • Chairman vs. Secretary Friendly Tournament Report

by Chris Jones

After a long break, the Chairman v. Secretary season opener returned. 

This was an ungraded friendly, with 45 minutes each on the clock and players were selected in approximate strength.

It was encouraging to see such a good turnout and we also welcomed potential new members Ross, Henry, Chris and Ben.

The Secretary won the toss with "Heads" and elected to have Board 1 start with White colours.

The match tipped one way, then another. But it came down to the very last game, with Jon turning around a worse position to snatch victory and secure a tied match.

Board
Chairman Team
Chairman-Colour
Result
Secretary-Colour
Secretary Team
1
Max Benett
Black
0-1
White
Russell Granat
2
Nick Skinner
White
1-0
Black
Dave Wallis
3
Paul O'Brien
Black
0-1
White
Peter Larwood
4
Ros
White
1-0
Black
Ben
5
Phil Crompton
Black
1-0
White
Jackson Hunter
6
Amit Talreja
White
0-1
Black
Chris Jones
7
Mark Cox
Black
0-1
White
Dave Bradley
8
John Young
White
1-0
Black
Keith Guiness
9
Mike Barrow
Black
0-1
White
Henry Heath
10
Eric Nepal
White
1-0
Black
McMillan

Final Score : 5-5 (Draw)

  • Battle on Board One

After the AGM at the beginning of September the first main event of the new season was a friendly match between the Chairman's team and the Secretary's team; contrasted with the cricketing tradition of Gentlemen versus Players.

The individual and overall results are reported on later by Chris Jones. Here, we look at the complex fight on the top board between Russell Granat (for the Secretary) and Max Bennett (for the Chairman).

White: Russell Granat
Black: Max Bennett
Event: Chairman's Team v Secretary's Team, 16 September, 2024
Opening: C00: French Defence - Steiner variation



1.e4        e6
2.c4        d5
3.cxd5    exd5
4.e5         ....
Russell's preferred line against the French Defence, getting off the beaten track as soon as possible, which he also played successfully in his Sussex Individual Championship game against Luke Rutherford earlier in the year.
Here, Luke had played 4...Bf5. Another idea would be the prophylactic 4...d4, preventing White from occupying that square with a pawn. In the present game Max sought control of the Centre in another way.

4. ....        c5
5.f4?!       ....
A more conventional way of proceeding would be 5.Bb5+ Nc6, 6.Ne2 Ne7 (or 6....Bd7), 7.d4.  Instead, the text move concedes a greater control of the Centre to Black while also weakening White's kingside.

5. ....        Nh6
6.Nf3       Qa5?!
Temporarily preventing White playing d4, and also Bb5+, but at the cost of delaying proper development. At this stage Russell regarded his position as poor, and foresaw difficulty in activating his pieces.

7.Nc3        d4
Energetic, but losing control of the central white squares.

8.Ne4       Nc6
9.Bc4        ....
Russell is developing his pieces effectively and has re-established equality, but there are some tactics ahead.

9. ....         Nb4!?

image.png

Position after 9. ....    Nb4!?

Tempting, with its threats of ...b5, or ...d3, or ...Bf5, with the idea of a knight fork at c2, and when White's d2-pawn cannot move without allowing a powerful double check.

10.a3
Strong, and virtually forced.

10. ....         Bf5

image.png

Position after 10....Bf5

The logical follow-up, which wins material but eases White's position.

11.axb4!
The only other feasible response was 11.Nfg5, with a likely continuation of 11....d3, 12.0-0 0-0-0, 13.Rb1, with a double-edged position where White's central pieces are not too stable, and Black's pawn at d3 may prove to be troublesome. But not 11.d3?? Nxd3+, 12.Kf1 Nxc1, 13.Ng3 b5!, when Black is clearly winning.

11. ....       Qxa1    
12.d3        ....
At last the d-pawn moves.

12. ....       Bd7?
Aimed at freeing the Black Queen, which is at present trapped on the first rank; but it does not turn out well. An alternative, and apparently somewhat better method, would be 12. ....cxb4, 13.0-0 (preferable to capturing the d4-pawn) 13. ....Qa5, 14.h3 Be6, 15.g4 Bxc4, 16.dxc4 0-0-0, 17.Qd3 when White maintains an edge despite being the exchange and a pawn down.

13.0-0      ....
Also good was 13.bxc5 Be7, 14.0-0 0-0, 15.Nxd4.

13. ....        a5?!

More consistent was 13. ....Qa4, 14.Qe2 Be6, allowing the Black Queen to at least see the battlefield.

14.bxc5      Bc6

image.png

Position after 14....Bc6

15.Qe2      ....
A sharp alternative was 15.e6 0-0-0 (worse would be 15. ....Qa4, 16.exf7+ Nxf7, 17.b3 Qb4, 18.Bd2 Qa3, 19.Bxf7+! Kxf7, 20.Ne5+ Ke7, 21.Nc4 Qa2, 22.Qh5 with an overwhelming position for White) 16.Ne5 Qa4, 17.Bb3 Qb5, 18.Bc4 Qa4, 19.b3 Qb4, 20.Bd2 Qa3, 21.Nxc6 bxc6, 22.exf7 when White has better development, more mobility, a safer king, with which the bishop pair and extra pawns combine to more than compensate for loss of the exchange.

15. ....       Bxc5
A bold and drastic measure in a difficult position. Another way of preventing Nd6+ would be to capture the knight, but after 15...Bxe4, 16.Qxe4 the white queen will prove to be too powerful. And if 15.... 0-0-0, then 16.Nd6+ Bxd6, 17.cxd6 Nf5, 18.g4 when Black is in an equally bad situation.

16.Nxc5    Nf5
17.g4         b6
18.Ne4      ....
White was spoilt for choice. 18.e6 and 18.Nb3 were also excellent options.

18....         Nh6
19.Nxd4    ....
Also good was 19.Nd6+ Kd8, 20.Nxd4.

19....         Bxe4
20.Bb5+!  ....
A Zwischenzug, which prevents castling.

20....        Kf8
21.Qxe4   
Here, Black resigned.
1-0

image.png

Final position, after 21.Qxe4

By now Max had understandably had enough. His pieces are scattered around the edge of the Board and are totally ineffective - a drastic consequence of the Black Queen's early excursion, material hunting, and confinement in the corner. The Queen, being powerful, and the Knight, complementing her movement and being an agile and tricky warrior, can combine in devastating attacks. But when they are deployed at the expense of activation of the rest of the army, and they do not achieve rapid success, then they are likely to be beaten back with loss of time or otherwise neutralised, as in this game.

JK / 18.09.24  

  • Budapest Chess Olympiad(2024)

Baadur Jobava vs. Luke McShane

In this one to watch game versus Baadur Jobava; Luke McShane is beaten.

For anyone interested, the game originally can be sourced here : https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=2771796

White: Baadur Jobava
Black: Luke McShane
Event: Budapest Olympiad - Hungary, 14 September, 2024
Opening: A45: Indian Defence - Richter-Veresov Attack



1. d4 Nf6 
2. Nc3 d5 
3. Bf4 e6 
White elects to play the 3. Bf4. variation of the Indian Defence, Richter-Veresov Attack instead of the more traditional 3. Bg5. mainline.

4. Nb5 Na6 
5. e3 Be7 
6. Nf3 O-O 
7. h4 c6 
8. Nc3 Nc7 
9. Ne2 c5 
10. c3 b5 
11. dxc5 Bxc5 
12. Ned4 Bd7 
13. Ne5 b4 
14. Nd3 ...
The White Knight forks Black's pawn on b4 & its only protection, the undefended Bishop on c5.

14. ... Bb6 
The Black Bishop is chased away, leaving the b4 pawn undefended.

15. Nxb4 Ne4 
The White Knight captures Black's undefended b4 pawn and goes ahead in material by a pawn.

16. Bd3 f6 
17. Bxe4 dxe4 
18. Qb3 Qe8 
19. a4 Ba5 
20. O-O Rf7 
21. Bxc7 Bxc7 
22. Nb5 Be5 
23. Rfd1 f5 
24. Nd6 Bxd6 
25. Rxd6 f4 
26. exf4 Rxf4 
27. Qd1 Rf7 
28. Qd4 Bxa4 
29. Qxe4 Bb3 
30. c4 a5 
After a series of exchanges including more pawns and minor Pieces; Black kicks the White Knight on b4 with a Rook pawn thrust.

31. Nc6 Qf8
The White Knight escapes to c6, replying and adding to the attack on the Black pawn on a5. The Black Queen threatens the undefended Rook on d6 and doubles the Black Rook threat on the White pawn at f2 and onto White's 2nd Rank. Black believes this is sufficient defence for the under-defended pawns on a5 & e6 as the White pawn on c4 is en prise from the Black bishop on  b3. The potential loss of a pawn won't cost as much to Black as a free Rook from White.

32. Rxa5 Rxa5 
White sacrifices the Rook on the a File forcing Black to recapture and materially go into the lead by a minor Piece.
 
33. Rd8 ... 
However instead of re-taking the Rook with 33. Nxa5; White uses the weakened Back-Rank and partially pins the Black Queen on f8 against the Black King on g8.

33. ... Ra1+
Black desperately tries to protect his a-File Rook. Queen on f8 & pawn on e6 by going on the offensive.

34. Kh2 Rxf2 
35. Qxe6+ Kh8 
Another pawn exchange takes place via the aforementioned strike by the Black Rook onto f2 and the White Queen onto e6. However the Black Rook moving off f7 has exposed the Black King on the e6-g8 diagonal allowing the White Queen to both force the Black King into the corner with tempo & protect the White pawn on c4.

36. Qe3 Qxd8 
White breaks the pin of the Black Bishop on b3 on the pawn on c4 while using the Queen to threaten the Bishop back. The pinned Black Queen is forced to trade space & time with her life otherwise the Rook on f2 is lost. White now leads materially by 1 pawn.

37. Nxd8 Rf8 
In the exchange, the Black Rook is now free to threaten the recapturing White Knight back.

38. Ne6 Rb8
The White Knight re-threatens the Black Rook, however Black blunders & instead of playing 38... Re8, he plays 38...Rb8 allowing a Queen fork by 39. Nxg7 Kxg7 40. Qg3+ then 41. Qxb8.

39. Qg3 ...
Sets up the Checkmate against the g7 pawn & threatens the Black Rook on b8 however this allows the Black Bishop on b3 to keep the pin on the White pawn on c4 against the White Knight on e6. Black's Rook can still escape and defend g7 with 39,,, Rg8 however the alternative Rook destination square of b7 leads to problems.

39... Rb7

40. Nc5
The White pawn on c4 is no longer pinned but now the White Knight threatens a fork against the Black Rook on b7 and the Black Bishop on b3 which is also attacked by the White Queen on g3. Materially, White is ahead by a pawn and is about to lose at least another minor piece. Black has to keep the Rook on the b File otherwise White plays Qb8#.

Black Resigns : 1-0

  • Chairman vs. Secretary Friendly Tournament

Monday 16th September - Prompt 7:30pm Start

  • Presentation of Trophies for 2023/2024

  • Championship      Russell Granat
  • Knockout Cup       Russell Granat
  • Challengers      Not Contested.
  • Derrick Trophy      Marcus Whitin and Ben Glyn-Jones
  • Ladder      Ben Glyn-Jones
  • Rapidplay      Dave Wallis
  • Ron Saunders Trophy      Dave Wallis
  • Knockout Plate      Paul O'Brien
  • Ken Haworth Junior Trophy      Eric Nehal
  • David Armstrong and his link to Lasker, Pillsbury and Blackburne

by John Knott

From the 1960s until the 1980s one of the strongest members of the Club was David Armstrong, who is referred to in Brian Denman's History narrative elsewhere on this website. David's father, Jack Roy Armstrong, was the author of a book on the history of Sussex and was the founder of the open-air museum of timber-framed buildings at Singleton, now known as the Weald and Downland Living Museum. David's family lived on the outskirts of Storrington, by good fortune not far from where a noted English chess player moved to in 1950, when David was in his teens.

   That player was Thomas Francis Lawrence (1871-1953), a seven-times Champion of the City of London Chess Club, and who, although a chess amateur (he worked for the Prudential Assurance Company), had beaten leading players of that era including Pillsbury and Blackburne; had drawn against Chigorin and World Champion Emanuel Lasker; and had represented England in many of the Trans-Atlantic Cable Matches around the start of the 20th century. David was introduced to Lawrence and benefited greatly by playing a number of games with him.

   I first met David in the late 1960s and knew him for almost 50 years. He had been associated with the Club since its days at the Rivoli Cinema, and continued when the Club moved, first to the Connaught Theatre and then to a room at the Dome Cinema, and in the late 1970s to the Chatsworth Hotel.

   In 1975, when the Club still met in a room at the Dome Cinema, David and I competed over a period of several weeks in an unusual match of ten games, in which we both played blindfold at the rate of 25 minutes for all the moves in a game. The result was four wins each and two draws. A satisfying feature was that there was never any dispute as to where the pieces were, despite some of the games reaching 35 moves or more. Game scores were not kept at the time, but I recorded them on returning home, and a few have survived. This is one of David's wins.

White: John Knott
Black: David Armstrong
Event: Both players blindfold, Played at Worthing Chess Club, 13 June, 1975
Time Control: All moves in 25 minutes
Opening: B96: Sicilian Najdorf



1.e4         c5
2.Nf3       d6
3.d4         cxd4       
4.Nxd4    Nf6
5.Nc3       a6
6.Bg5       ...   
The sharpest line against the Najdorf.

6. ...           e6
7.f4            Qc7
8.Qf3         Nbd7
9.O-O-O   b5
10.a3          Bb7 
Later theory preferred 10...Rb8.

11.g4           Be7
12.Bxf6       gxf6
The more usual capture by the bishop, 12....Bxf6, would have allowed either 13.g5 or the ultra sharp 13.Bxb5+!? axb5, 14.Ndxb5 with the possible continuation ... Qb6, 15. Nxd6+ Kf8, 16.Nxb7 Bxc3. 17.Qxc3 Qxb7, 18.Qd4 with about equal chances, although Black would have some difficulty in completing his development.      

13.h4           ...
Preparing g4-g5. Sharper was 13.f5.

13....            O-O-O
14.Bh3         ...
This was the original idea, fighting against the e6-square; but that is more appropriate when Black castles on the kingside. Now, the bishop would probably be more useful on the long diagonal.

14....            Kb8
15.Rhe1       Nb6
16.Qf2         Nc4  
17.Na2          ...
Black was threatening ...Nxa3, but a better way of meeting this would have been 17.Rd3.

17. ...            d5
18.exd5       Bxd5
19.Kb1         ...
 

image.png

Position after 19.Kb1

19. ...          Bc5
Instead, a sharp try was 19..... Nxb2, 20.Kxb2 Bxa3+ 21.Kb1 (Not 21.Kxa3 Qa5+, 22.Kb2 Qa2+, 23.Kc1 Qa3+ 24.Kd2 Qxh3, 25.Re3 Qg2) ... Bc5, 22.c3 e5, 23.fxe5 fxe5, 24.Bg2 exd4, 25.cxd4 Bxg2, 26.Qxg2 Bd6, when Black emerges from the complications with an extra pawn and a bishop for a knight.

20.Nc1        Qb6
Stronger was exploiting the pin by 20....e5.    

21.Ncb3       Be7
22.g5            a5
23.Bg2         a4
24.Bxd5       Rxd5
White lost on time in a losing position.  0-1  

In another of the surviving games I was more successful.

White: John Knott
Black: David Armstrong
Event: Both players blindfold, Played at Worthing Chess Club, 16 May, 1975
Time Control: All moves in 25 minutes
Opening: A45: Blackmar-Diemer Gambit



1.d4         Nf6
2.f3          d5
3.e4         dxe4       
4.Nc3      Bf5
5.g4         Bg6
6.g5         Nfd7   
Alternatively, 6....Nd5, 7.Nxe4 e6, 8.h4 Be7, when White's advanced kingside pawns are vulnerable.

7.fxe4       e6
Instead, 7....e5! 8.h4 exd4, 9.Qxd4 Nc6, 10.Qf2 gave about equal chances.

8.Be3        ...
Better would have been 8.h4 when, e.g., Bb4, 9.Bg2 h5, 10.Ne2, with some advantage to White.

8. ...          Bb4
9.Bg2        c6
10.Ne2      Na6
11.a3          Be7
12.Qd2      Qc7
13.O-O-O O-O-O
14.h4          ...
White has now established a clear advantage.

14....            Bh5
15.Qe1         Bxe2??
16.Qxe2      Qa5  
17.Qf3          ...
Instead, 17.Qe1 would have protected the c3-knight in the event of ...Bxa3.

17. ...            Rhf8
Also missing the win of the a-pawn.

18.Bf4          b5
19.d5            ...
Objectively better was 19.Nd5 cxd5, 20.exd5 Nb6, 21.d6, but in view of the match conditions the text move was good enough.

19. ...            exd5
20.exd5
Black resigned.  1-0

image.png

Final Position after 20.exd5

One possible continuation would have been 20. ... Bxa3, 21.dxc6  Bxb2+, 22.Kxb2 Qb4+, 23.Ka1 Qa3+, 24.Na2 Qxf3, 25.cxd7+ Rxd7, 26.Bxf3, when White emerges with two extra pieces.

The following game from the match ended in a hair-raising draw, after both players made mistakes.

White: David Armstrong
Black: John Knott
Event: Both players blindfold, Played at Worthing Chess Club, 23 May, 1975
Time Control: All moves in 25 minutes
Opening: E76: King's Indian Defence, Four Pawns Attack



1.d4         Nf6
2.c4          g6
3.Nc3       Bg7    
4.e4         d6
5.f4          O-O
6.Nf3       c5
7.dxc5      Qa5
8.Bd3       Qxc5
9.Qe2       b6
10.Be3     Qc7
11.O-O    Na6
Another idea here would have been 11...Nbd7, for better control of the e5-square.

12.a3         Bb7
13.Bd2      Nc5
14.Bc2       a5
15.b4         axb4
16.axb4     Rxa1  
17.Rxa1      Ra8??
Black has taken his eye off the c5-knight!

18.Rxa8     Bxa8
19.bxc5      Qxc5+
20.Be3       Qa5
21.Bd4        e5
22.fxe5       Nd7
23.Qd2       dxe5
24.Be3        Nc5
25.Bxc5       Qxc5+
26.Qf2        Qxc4
27.Qd2        Bh6??
Black has the bishop pair and two pawns against three minor pieces, so he needs to take desperate measures. The move played allows White a theoretical mate in four moves, but meanwhile the Black queen will have a clear field.

28.Qxh6      ...
The alternative was 28.Qd3, encouraging an exchange of queens.
28. ...           Qxc3
 

image.png

Position after 28...Qxc3

29.h4?          ...
White realises that if he plays 29.Ng5 immediately, he will be mated by ...Qe1#, so he creates some room for his king.  But this gives Black chances. Instead, 29.Qd2 preserved White's advantage.

29. ...           Qxc2
30.Ng5        ...
Now threatening mate in two moves.

30. ...           Qc1+
After an uphill fight from losing his knight at move 19, Black aims purely for perpetual check as he now controls the dark squares around White's king. However, in doing so he misses an unexpected winning opportunity involving the exchange of queens, e.g. 30.... Qd1+!, 31.Kf2 Qh5!, 32.Qxh5 gxh5, 33.Ke3 f6, 34.Nf3 Kf7, 35.Nd2 Ke6, 36.Kd3 f5, 37.exf5+ Kxf5, 38.g3 b5 with a winning endgame.

31.Kh2          Qf4+
32.Kg1          Qc1+
Again there were winning prospects after 32...Bxe4, 33.Qxh7+ Kf8, 34.Qh8+ Ke7, 35,Qb8 Qe3+, 36.Kh2 Bc6, 37.Qa7+ Bd7, 38.Qa2 Qf4+, 39.g3 Qf5, 40.Kg1 Kf8 when the Black king will obtain shelter, allowing the bishop and two extra pawns to make progress.


33.Kh2          Qf4+
34.Kg1          Qe3+
35.Kh2

 

Draw agreed.  ½ : ½  

Some years later, when the Club had moved to a basement room at the Chatsworth Hotel, David sportingly agreed to take the black side in a game to test the Morra Gambit, in which I had become interested. For this game, which turned out to be the most violent of our encounters, we used a board and pieces and we both had our eyes very wide open.

White: John Knott
Black: David Armstrong
Event: Played at Worthing Chess Club, 1983
Opening: B21: Sicilian Defence, Morra Gambit - The first three moves agreed in advance.



1.e4          c5
2.d4         cxd4
3.c3          dxc3    
4.Nxc3     a6
5.Nf3        e6
6.Bc4       Be7
7.O-O      b5
8.Bb3       Bb7
9.Qe2       d6
10.Rd1     Nd7
11.Bf4       Qc7
12.Rac1     ...
At the slight cost of a pawn White has now completed his development and has his pieces on good squares, while Black's King remains in the centre. This calls for an immediate attack.

12. ...         Qb8
13.Ng5!?    ...
Aggressive, and with a particular idea in mind; but objectively even stronger was 13.e5. Now the fireworks start, with White sacrificing four of his pieces to create energy.

13. ...         Bxg5
14.Bxd6!    ...
This was White's plan, breaking down the Black King's defences.

14. ...         Qa7
The task now is to open up the position further, regardless of the cost.

15.Nd5        ...
Giving Black a choice of captures.

15. ...          Bxc1
Capturing the Knight with either the e-pawn or the b7-Bishop would have led to the opening of the e-file.

16.Nc7+     ...
Not with a view to capturing the Rook. White is interested in activity and getting at the Black King. 

16. ...         Kd8
17.Bxe6      ...
So as to complete the demolition of Black's defences with tempo from a Knight check.

17. ...          fxe6
18.Nxe6+  Ke8
If, instead, ...Kc8, a good response would be 19.Qc2! Nc5, 20.Bxc5 when ...Qb8 allows mate in one move.

19.Nxg7+   Kf7
If, instead, 19. ...Kd8, then (with the g7-pawn missing) 20.Ne6+ Ke8, 21.Qh5 is mate, while 20....Kc8, 21.Qc2+ leads to a gain of material followed by an early mate.

20.Qh5+    Kxg7
21.Qg4+

Black resigned.   1-0

Final position, after 21.Qg4+

Had the game continued, one possible continuation would have been 21. ... Kh6, 22.Rd3  Be3, 23.Bf4  Bxf4, 24.Rh3 mate, when White's queen and single rook have overcome a virtually complete Black army. And if 22. ...Bg5 (instead of ...Be3), then 23.Rg3 Kg7, 24.Qxd7+ Kh6, 25.Qh3+ Kg6, 26.Qf5+ Kg7, 27.Be5+ Nf6, 28.Qxf6+ Kg8, 29.Qg7 mate.

   From the early 1980s David and I, together with Roger Jacks, formerly of Worthing but then living in Peacehaven, met on Saturday afternoons at what was then Macari's Coffee Lounge near the Dome Cinema, for games (usually played between David and Roger) and for general conversation. Those meetings ran until early 2020, the last four years being without David, who died in 2016. We used a corner table at Macari's, and were known to regular patrons as The Chess Club. I occasionally sent postcards to the other two addressed that way when I was abroad.

   David and Roger were both of a rather stubborn nature and they tended to concentrate on one opening at a time, both being determined to be its master. For example, at one stage David played the Milner Barry Gambit in the French Defence for six months or more, and later spent a similar time on the White side of From's Gambit in Bird's Opening. From time to time an amusing situation would occur, and David would laugh and laugh and laugh. He himself sometimes said that his epitaph would be "He died laughing." Sadly, that was not to be, as he contracted Leukaemia.

   I remember David as a gentle, intelligent, and widely-read person, who although sociable was probably more at home in the countryside where he lived and worked. He often spoke with fondness of his time in the army during National Service. That was one of his common points with Roger, whose call-up time included involvement in the Suez Crisis in 1956. At Macari's, conversation would sometimes turn to the Club days at the Rivoli Cinema (which was at the north end of the High Street on a site now redeveloped), and to the members from that era. These included Major Balding, Leslie Head (who later ran a chess column in the Worthing Gazette), Dr Bokenham (whom I once played in the early 1950s in a match between the Club and Steyning Grammar School), Mr Chettle, Miss Bell and others. At the Rivoli, the Club playing area on a mezzanine floor had a Palm Court atmosphere, with boards at small tables with wicker chairs. In those days there was a quaint practice during afternoon matches with visiting clubs. At a convenient point in a game the home player would invite his opponent to take some refreshment, which involved leaving the Rivoli and walking a few yards down the High Street past an antique shop to a little café, for tea and a slice of cake.  

© Copyright John Knott, 2024

  • Club A.G.M.

Monday 2nd September - 7:35pm

©2025 by Worthing Chess Club.

bottom of page